- Analyzing Special Relativity’s Time Dilation Within The Context of Lorentz Relativity (2016) [Updated 7 years ago]
- Data That Allegedly Proves Special Relativity Disproves It (2013) [Updated 7 years ago]
by Nick Percival read the paper:
- Twin Paradox Project Update Including the Mainstream Response (2012) [Updated 8 years ago]
by Nick Percival read the paper:
- The Twin Paradox: How To Win The Debate (2009) [Updated 1 decade ago]
- Implications For SRT: Observations From A Long Odyssey (2009) [Updated 1 decade ago]
- A Very Doable Experiment For NASA To Look Inside The Twin Paradox (2006) [Updated 1 decade ago]
by Nick Percival read the paper:
- Analyzing Special Relativity’s Time Dilation Within The Context of Lorentz Relativity (2016) [Updated 7 years ago]
Einstein’s Special Relativity dramatically changes Lorentz Relativity by adding a false claim, namely, the Constant Velocity of Light Principle and declaring that all inertial frames are equal and all those inertial frames simulate the properties of Lorentz Relativity’s single, preferred frame. This transformed a valid physics theory, Lorentz Relativity, into an inherently flawed physics theory, Special Relativity, that “"fortuitously"” served as a useful math tool during the period when the identity of the correct preferred frame was unknown. Focusing on “time dilation”, it will be seen how GPS data makes this view clear in two dramatic ways.
- Data That Allegedly Proves Special Relativity Disproves It (2013) [Updated 7 years ago]
by Nick Percival read the paper:
This paper analyzes data from GPS, the Hafele-Keating Experiment and muon decay measurements that are claimed to support Special Relativity’s claim of time dilation. It is found that this data actually does not support Special Relativity and in some cases is evidence against Special Relativity. The “time dilation” data is also analyzed in terms of its historical development and in terms of the Twin Paradox.
- Twin Paradox Project Update Including the Mainstream Response (2012) [Updated 8 years ago]
by Nick Percival read the paper:
A brief discussion of the 'Open Letter On The Twin Paradox' and the other 10 supporting pages in the web site are described. A summary of the findings of the associated study Report is given. Special attention is focused on the mainstream response including a persistent flaw.
- The Twin Paradox: How To Win The Debate (2009) [Updated 1 decade ago]
The Twin Paradox has raged for more than a century. Relativists have devised a number of resolutions for the paradox. All these reconciliation arguments are accepted by the physics community even though many are mutually contradictory. Presenting the rather obvious flaws in these reconciliation arguments had yielded very few conversions. However, after decades of experience, new techniques have emerged that show great promise and have led to individual successes.
- Implications For SRT: Observations From A Long Odyssey (2009) [Updated 1 decade ago]
?The Twin Paradox: How To Win The Debate? discussed the author's 45 year experience with debating the Twin Paradox and new approaches to that debate. That long and detailed experience with the Twin Paradox yielded some novel conclusions about LAT and the potential for a modified SRT.
- A Very Doable Experiment For NASA To Look Inside The Twin Paradox (2006) [Updated 1 decade ago]
by Nick Percival read the paper:
(Updated 2009): There is wide disagreement about how the net proper time difference in the Twin Paradox accumulates even among those who contend ?there is no paradox?. The proposed experiment will resolve this debate and also will show how to significantly extend currently accepted theory. The experiment will have the most impact on space-time physics since the Michelson-Morley experiment and promises to correct some unjustified conclusions drawn from the Michelson-Morley experiment.
