Member

The inner structure of the Earth, in the form as it's still expressed today in the standard books, is a complete reflection of the archaic method of thinking. The continual change in the state of matter by pressure and temperature rising towards the Earth center, it is not an essential change in the character of chemical elements to create the core, shell-like building of the mantle, lithosphere and the known processes. This is also a firm argument why the necessity appears to place a sort of ultra dense matter as the source of permanent transformation in the core's central region, to create different particles and sub particles in bonds of atoms or free in radiation. Lets suppose for a moment that we would remove the silicate coverings. What would be the outcome? The processes of transformation and growth would continue in the core. The "small earth" would begin to recreate the silicate coat progressively with time, and we would "see" the imitation of crust formation, as well as the differentiation, the "bone of discord" between the fixists, mobilists and supporters of the expansion and their "quarrel" would end forever. Such solution on the geologic development of Earth crust must radically change the method of thinking about the origin of the solar system.