Member

The theory of planetary vortexes is not intended as a negation of the Newton's theory of gravitation, but as its complement. The Newtonian theory of gravitation describes the movement of celestial bodies which constitutes the solar system (planets, comets, asteroids) as in a vacuum, in a completely void, matter less space.

The theory of planetary vortexes takes into consideration the existence of the interplanetary matter as well as a possible global movement of this interplanetary matter. Comparatively with the Newtonian theory, in the planetary vortexes theory, besides the Sun-planet interaction (Sun-comet or Sun-asteroid interaction), there is also an interaction between interplanetary environment and planet (or comet, asteroid, etc). The corrective term expressing the interaction between interplanetary environments and a planet (or comet, asteroid, etc) refers to the nature (density) of the celestial body, and we may not apply this corrective term to a fundamental interaction.

Although there have been raised a number of objections against the special theory of relativity since its publication in 1905, none of these have been able to convince the scientific community of another alternative.
There are a lot of books which claims the lifelikeness of special theory of relativity and on the other hand, other books trying to dismiss it.

The problem of contesting books regard their focus on the consequences of special theory of relativity, with all sort of paradoxes and no one has tried to explain in a alternative way the experiments which forms the fundaments of special theory of relativity.

The present book will be focused on the experiments which forms the kernel of special theory of relativity and a, common sense" alternative interpretation of phenomena is offered.

If someone imagines that the Inquisition time was gone, it will be very disappointed when the history of this theory will be published. Nowadays if someone thoughts don't follow the preconceived (and generally false) predecessors' ideas,  will be excluded automatically from ,,scientific community". It is assumed by actual and ortodox physics, the setting down of times when foundations of a theory must be debated.

For beginning, the purposes of the up presented theory are, to set up a new, simpler and realistic description of physical world.

When the translation of this theory will be finished, a journal (for beginning in an electronic form) will continue and expand the applications of this theory in practice. Eventually article, comments, improvement of material from published books can be directed at this stage personally to: sorincosofret@yahoo.com

OVERVIEW

The microcosm is not a field of science where some scientists build paradoxes and others try to explain them. The physic of microcosm is an exact science and possesses its law. The forward text will map a new physical and mathematical model for the atom and molecule world and implications of this model in other branch of physic and chemistry. Being the first description in a deterministic manner of microcosms, the book will focus more on model possibility to explain varied phenomena and less on the mathematical description. In any case the future detailed description will not require advanced knowledges in mathematical field. There is also another motivation for some absence in mathematical description, more precisely, lack of original data. It is not possible to use already altered date for a new description of phenomena.

For the 'theoretical physicists' which build for every phenomenon a new theory some experiments are proposed. These experiments are called, the 'ten euro experiments', because these are the investments necessary to make the experiments home.

Some 'fundamental' paradoxes of atomism (like Schrodinger cat, in vogue Einstein-Podolsky-de Rosen paradox, Bell theorem, etc. aren't presented because in the new model these not exist. After reading the book it is case to ask himself if the fundamental idea of quantum mechanic expressed in the following question:'Does the moon change because a mouse looks at it?' can have a positive answer. Actual quantum mechanic say 'yes'; the moon can change if a mouse look at it. The proposed theory says 'definitely no'.