Enter the content which will be displayed in sticky bar

Speaker:
Stoyan Sarg
BSM - Supegravitation Unified Theory - A New Approach in Physics

Date: 2009-03-29 Time: 16:00 - 18:00 US/Pacific (1 decade 5 years ago)
America/Los Angeles: 2009-03-29 16:00 (DST)
America/New York: 2009-03-29 19:00 (DST)
America/Sao Paulo: 2009-03-29 20:00
Europe/London: 2009-03-29 23:00
Asia/Colombo: 2009-03-30 04:30
Australia/Sydney: 2009-03-30 10:00 (DST)

Where: Online Video Conference
Recording Playback
This video conference used DimDim, now a private company.
The meeting can be replayed by clicking this link:
watch the meeting recording


Discussion

Your membership status does not allow you to participate in discussion or see all comments.
Found: 5

Stoyan Sarg
Reply for "Cosmic Lattice"
1 decade 4 years ago [2010-05-16 19:42:36]

?Cosmic? originates from a Greek language with a meaning ?Universe?. ?Lattice is from old French ?lattis?. Nobody could claim that the phrase ?Cosmic lattice? is a discovery or copyright. The Basic Structures of Matter ? Supergravitation Unified Theory (BSM-SG) used this phrase to name a completely original physical model in order to describe the properties of the physical vacuum. The treatise BSM-SG was copyrighted in 2001 following a web publication in the same year. In 2002 the whole theory was archived and catalogued in the National Library of Canada and article was published in lanl.arxiv.org. In 2003 a few articles  were published in peer reviewed journals (some of them on-line). Since then theory was reported in six international scientific conferences. The author also published  3 books in English and one USpatent, all of them related to BSM-SG. (Books review in Physics in Canadajournal). The recently published book ?Field Propulsion by control of gravity? (2009) contains theoretical and experimental material related to BSM-SG. Many of the publications are on-line including videos from some conferences and experiments.

Main webpage: www.helical-structures.org

Complete list of publication: http://www.helical-structures.org/SARG-publications.pdf">www.helical-structures.org/SARG-publications.pdf
Walter Rella
Cosmic Lattice
1 decade 5 years ago [2009-03-29 22:03:02]
Dear Dr. Redbourne,

Don?t wonder nor be worried by your ideas coming up simultaneously elsewhere. That?s what?s happening as a rule, when scientific revolutions are impending. One may, in this respect, be referred to Rupert Sheldrakes Morphogenetic Field. We are not interested in having disputes like those between Leibniz and Newton again. Be happy that you are not alone with your ideas!

As far as your lattice structure is concerned, I wished to remember you that David Bohm first had the idea of a dynamic potential field almost 30 years ago. Simultaneously W.A. Azjukowski in Leningrad, then shielded by the Soviet Union, developed a most elaborated theory about the ether, or the vacuum, being constituted by a potential field akin to a thermodynamic field. Since these fields exhibit coherent properties, their existence could not be demonstrated experimentally by definition. We need to infer them theoretically using as a logic probe the method of analogy, thus, making reference to phenomena in other fields of natural science ? e.g. to the field of thermodynamics. That?s what Azjukowski has done and what I myself did in the eightees, by making clear how the logic of analogy can be applied properly as a tool of inference. It is evident ? without having read your papers ? that the original lattice structure exhibits a maximum of entropy, i.e. of disorder, giving rise to the expansion of the universe. The lattice structure may brake up accidentally creating, out of ?nothing?, charged particles (being another name for a state of incompleteness), which, if their re-association is prevented to some extent, create coherent fields of electrical force (which is another name for a state of resonance at distance). The state of resonance reduces the entropy of the system and, hence, the expansive potential ? i.e. it must act as an attractive field. The electric attraction, on the other hand, must give rise to a perpendicular force, named magnetism. Thus, expressed by the thermodynamic analogy, any coordinated motion of gaseous particles (as an analogy of the electric field) will give rise to a reduction of the thermodynamic pressure (as an analogy of the vacuum pressure) in perpendicular direction leading to an attractive force (as an analogy of magnetism). Following these lines, Azjukowski was able to explain the whole spectrum of electromagnetic phenomenology, and by taking into account temperature changes also, was able to explain gravitation. I wouldn?t go in more detail. A summary in English of the Russian written book ?Efirodinamika? (Ethero-dynamics) by Azjukowski is available on my NPA website (Greg Volk was kind to place it there). Have a look at it. Probably you will find most of your ideas already developed in this book.

Walter Rella

Buryl Payne
Super Gravity and Spin
1 decade 5 years ago [2009-03-28 14:23:12]
A simple experiment performed with a very simple and inexpensive device shows the presence of a spin, or rotational force, around humans and apparently around all stellar objects, especially living organisms. This spin force is not in the electromagnetic spectrum, though it is related to ordinary iron magnetism. It is very much larger than magnetism though.
Perhaps any theory of gravity and electromagnetism could take this into account. An ebook is available at www.buryl.com">www.buryl.com under ?All Products?.

Buryl Payne
Richard Benish
Is it Testable?
1 decade 5 years ago [2009-03-28 12:00:23]
Whether Dr. Sarg's work is original or traces back to Dr Redbourne, its greatest lack, to my mind, is that it fails to make predictions that differ markedly from standard physics and that could be tested with existing technology.
Or perhaps I have missed it. In either case, the question applies to not only the work of NPA members and their ilk, but to all theories that purport any kind of "grand unification" or to go beyond the prevailing paradigm: How do we prove it by experiment? The answer to this question needs to be prominent.
Especially important for NPA members and their ilk is to make predictions that differ dramatically from standard physics--predictions that can't be fudged, predictions that, if supported in the laboratory, will convince everybody that a new direction has been opened and illuminated. Without this, I believe, physics will continue to flounder as it has for the last century or so.
Cosmic Lattice
1 decade 5 years ago [2009-03-26 07:26:07]

Dr Sarg;

This again, is specifically my invention. The Lattice is an elastic fabric under extreme tension. As with Greg Volk and Rope-Pull, I expect Stoyan to justify the existence of the Lattice on the basis of his own developed history of his Unified Theory, leading up to his using this model.

So far, Greg has not justified his use of my Rope-Pull concept.

Calling it the "Cosmic" Lattice is just one more incident of people taking my work and renaming it.  This is NOT a "new approach", it is taken directly from my work, and has my fingerprints all over it. I keep all my developmental work in a protected archive.

I can almost guarantee the mechanism of Stoyan's generation of particles from the Lattice material as from resonant shattering. And there'll be an explanation of so-called "charge" using resonant standing waves in the Lattice in the case of "repulsion". And in the case of "attraction" the standing waves do not exist because of the difference in resonant frequencies of vibration between electrons and protons, allowing my Power Waves to drive them together (Gravity-Force).

But I do guarantee you won't have any explanation of the mechanics of the magnetic "field", because I haven'y published on that yet.

As I said to Greg; if NPA members don't support each other, what do they expect coming back?

J Raymond Redbourne.