- A revision of the principle of relativity (2013) [Updated 1 decade ago]
by Zbigniew Modrzejewski read the paper:
- Arguments for the Invalidity of the Minkowski's Physical Spacetime Idea in GTR (2011) [Updated 1 decade ago]
by Zbigniew Modrzejewski read the paper:
- Arguments for the Invalidity of the Relativistic Big Bang Idea (2009) [Updated 7 years ago]
by Zbigniew Modrzejewski read the paper:
- A revision of the principle of relativity (2013) [Updated 1 decade ago]
by Zbigniew Modrzejewski read the paper:
Prof. Janusz Drozdzynski: "In this paper, "A revision of the principle of relativity", some questions connected with the time dilation effect are discussed. A thought experiment is presented in which it has been proven that on the basis of the trajectory of a laser pulse in a moving frame of reference (spaceship) with a constant velocity, it is possible to determine the direction of movement and speed of the system with respect to the velocity of light. It has also been shown how this statement could be experimentally confirmed. We conclude that Einstein's principle of relativity needs a revision." ( Paper's English language version: www.zbigniew-modrzejewski.webs.com/PE01051209EPep.docx )
- Arguments for the Invalidity of the Minkowski's Physical Spacetime Idea in GTR (2011) [Updated 1 decade ago]
by Zbigniew Modrzejewski read the paper:
"O NATURACH CZASU" -- Few principal philosophical arguments and some empirical evidence for the invalidity of the Minkowski's physical spacetime idea in GTR. This paper received a positive review in 2011 from Professor Arkadiusz Jadczyk, http://arkadiusz-jadczyk.org/jadczyk_cv.html
Professor George F. R. Ellis, Mathematics Department, University of Cape Town, "Physics in the Real Universe: Time and Spacetime": "Issues of Ontology: The hidden issue underlying all this discussion is the question of the ontological nature of spacetime: does spacetime indeed exist as a real physical entity, or is it just a convenient way of describing relationships between physical objects, which in the end are all that really exist at a fundamental level? Is it absolute or relational? [...] a useful starting point for a fresh look at the ontological issue, and from there a renewed discussion of the degree to which our representations of the nature of spacetime are an adequate representation of its true existential nature."
- Arguments for the Invalidity of the Relativistic Big Bang Idea (2009) [Updated 7 years ago]
by Zbigniew Modrzejewski read the paper:
"DLACZEGO ISTNIEJE RACZEJ COS NIZ NIC?" -- Why is there something rather than nothing? More precisely: Why is there the ontological Being rather than ontological total Nothingness? A few powerfull philosophical arguments and some empirical evidence for the invalidity of the relativistic Big Bang idea.
