Enter the content which will be displayed in sticky bar
Prof. Joe Alexander Nahhas
local time: 2017-06-25 13:29 (-04:00 DST)
Prof. Joe Alexander Nahhas Abstracts
Titles
  • Einstein's Three Errors Named Light Constant Velocity (2012) [Updated 4 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • The Top Ten Wrong Physicists (2010) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Nuclear Standard Model is based on visual effects that comes in 1/3, 2/3, 1 forms (2009) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • 350 Years in Hiding: Kepler's-Newton's Time Dependent Equations (2009) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • 2009 Total Collapse of General Relativity Theory: CM Draconis Binary Stars Motion (2009) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • 20th Century Physics' Greatest Mistake is E = mc? (2009) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • 2008 General Relativity Failures: The Case of V731 Cep Binary Stars Motion Puzzle Solution Without Rigging (2008) [Updated 4 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Relativity Failures 2006: The Case of NV CMa Binary Stars (2006) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • General Relativity Theory: Confusion of Physics; The Case of GG Orion Binary Stars Motion (2000) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • 1997 General Relativity Failures: The Case of SW Canis Majoris Binary Stars Systems (1997) [Updated 4 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Einstein's Relativity Failures #3: The Case of V1143Cgyni Binary Stars Axial Rotation Rate Puzzle Solution (1990) [Updated 4 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Einstein's Relativity Failures #4: The Case of DI Hya Binary Stars System (1990) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Einstein's Relativity Failures #5: The Case of Professor Lacy of University of Arkansas and V541Cgyni (1990) [Updated 4 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Alpha Coronae Borealis: A Binary Stars System Motion in Contradiction with Relativity Theory (1986) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Einstein's Relativity Failures #2: DI Her Apsidal Motion Puzzle Solution (1985) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Einstein's Relativity Failures #1: The Case of As Camelopardis Apsidal Motion Puzzle Solution (1984) [Updated 4 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • First Experimental Proof of "Not" Constant Velocity of Light (1983) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Red-Shift Spin Dependence Experimental Proofs (1983) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • DI Her 1980: The problem that started a wave to unseat Einstein (1980) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Real time gravity (1980) [Updated 4 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Reines and Cowan wrong: Savannah River Netrino Experiment (1980) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Mu - Muon elementary particle is a bundle of 207 diffracted electrons (1980) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Dark Energy Tribe of fraud (1980) [Updated 4 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Newton's Rotational equation expalins space - time dents (1980) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Atomic Energy and Academic Fraud: The Case of the Hydrogen Atom (1979) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Atomic Energy Academic Incompetence: The case of the line spectra of the atom (1979) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Shrodinger Equation derived From Newton's - Kepler's F = 0 (1979) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Nuclear Energy Discovery II: NO Expanding Universe (1979) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Nuclear Energy Discovery III: No Big Bang Ever Happened (1979) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Nuclear Energy Discovery Supreme: 2/3[100% + 100%/3]= 88.88 % silly missing dark energy (1979) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Nuclear Energy Discovery I: The Negative Energy Spectrum (1979) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Energy and Mass Balance Without Fictious Dark Energy (1979) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Universal gravitational constant G: Investigative report (1979) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Chadwick's Neutron mistake (1979) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Harvard Physics Department Monopoly Games: The Insignificance of Relativity Experimental Proofs (1978) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Earth-Planets Telecommunications and "Apparent" Shapiro's Time Delays Solutions / Constant (1978) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • De Sitter Wrong: The Binary Stars Thought Experiment (1978) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Axial Rotations Rate Calculations in Eclipsing Detached Binary Stars / Planetary Systems (1978) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Nuclear Standard Model is Illusion based: Nature's 1/3, 2/3, 1 visual deceptions (1978) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • The Four Experimental Proofs of General Theory of Relativity: What Proofs? (1978) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Plank's Constant h; E = 1/2 mc? The Case of the Single Slit Experiment (1978) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Wave-Particle Duality: Particles seen in real time will have a wave-like profile (1978) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Early Quantum Mechanics:a silly name for Newton's F = 0 (1978) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Einstein's Relativity Space-Time physics is the result of Earth-Planet light signal miss reading by Astronomers (1978) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Compton's "Apparent" Wave-Length Contraction Effect (1978) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • 11th century refraction law Sine i = n sine r derived fron Newton's-Kepler's F = 0 (1978) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Coulomb's - Maxwell's Electromganetic Theory: a re-run of of F = m a (1978) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Quantum = classical + relativistic (1978) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Relativitistic Gravitational Red Shifts Confusions: Harvard's Pound Rebka Confusion of an Experiment (1977) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Where Relativity Collapsed: Apsidal Motion of Binary Stars Solution (1977) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Mercury "Apparent" Advance of Perihelion of 43 " of an Arc / Century (1977) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Alfred Noble Flea Market of Physics and Academia (1977) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • E = mc?/2 and not E = mc? (1977) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Planetary Motion Around The Sun: Deleting Relativity Without Loss of Subject (1977) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Length Contraction: First Law of Relativity Theory: What Shrunk is Physics and Not Objects (1977) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Where are the Stars 1977? Venus as a Proof of Stars Misplacement (1977) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • GPS: Global Positioning Systems (1977) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Special Relativity Theory:Based on two erroneous principles (1977) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Nuclear Gravity: Planetary motion can be expalined by Nuclear force (1977) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • The New Red - Shift: A Newly Born Universe (1977) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Time: is a scale and not a dimension except on Campus (1977) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Inverse Cube Force motion delays (1977) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Light motion (1977) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Relativity theory is dead (1977) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • First Nobel Prize winners 1902 crime against physics (1977) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • The mathematical proof of Einstein is wrong (1977) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • The Mathematical proof of Einstein and all modern physics and physicists are all wrong (1977) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Johann Georg Van Soldner 1801 light bending historical mistake (1977) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • It is a particle you dummy: A particle motion visual effects is a wave motion with Newton's - Kepler's F = 0 (1976) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Royal England wrong physics and wrong Physicists Newton Eddington Einstein (1976) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Sir Issac Newton Most famous Equation: wrong (1976) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Kepler's Third Law = Newton's Inverse Square Law (1976) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Earth Absolute Motion: Waiting on Discovery (1974) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Light projection velocity and not light velocity that is measured as constant (1974) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • MMX: It Took Glamorous Aether and Gave Dumb Space-time (1973) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Perihelion precession period 400 years old formula found in hiding ending relativity (1973) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Einstein's Relativistic Bully of Time Equation (1973) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Le Verrier Historical Mistake that Created Relativity Stupidity (1973) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Copernicus Wrong Time (1973) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • Earth's Axial tilt 23.4392 degress illusion (1973) [Updated 4 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • 50 out 1001 Mersury's perihelion precession advance (1973) [Updated 4 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • NASA knows nothing about space I (1971) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • 500 years of wrong astronomy (1971) [Updated 4 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:
  • NASA knows nothing about space II (1971) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

  • Abstracts Details
  • Einstein's Three Errors Named Light Constant Velocity (2012) [Updated 4 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Light velocity is never been measured. Light constant velocity number c = 299792458 meters/second published by NIST (National Institute of Science and Technology) is a measurement error that can be found in Augustine de Coulomb experiment; However light constant velocity can be independently derived and is distance accumulation of three measurements embedded errors that humans made/make all the time when viewing a light source.


  • The Top Ten Wrong Physicists (2010) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Modern physics is all wrong. It exists because classical physics was based on good observation, but bad mathematics. Correcting the mathematics of observed data demolishes modern physics and introduces a new physics, better than anything said or published in history. This paper attacks the mathematics of ten highly respected, but wrong physicists. The top ten wrong physicists in chronological order:

    1. Isaac Newton, English mathematician. Formulation, interpretation and solution of gravitational effects
    2. Johann Georg Von Soldner, German astronomer. Miscalculations in light bending and light aberration
    3. Urbain Le Verrier, French mathematician and astronomer. Wrong angular velocities of planetary motions
    4. Hendrik Antoon Lorentz, Dutch physicist (Nobel 1902). Length contraction
    5. Albert Einstein, German physicist (Nobel 1921). Real space and time confusion for space-time
    6. James Chadwick, English physicist (Nobel 1935). The neutron mistake
    7. Richard Feynman, American physicist (Nobel 1965). Quantum mechanics and the 1/5 amplitude
    8. Irwin Shapiro, American physicist. Time delay and GPS [Global Positioning System]
    9. Frederick Reines, American physicist (Nobel 1995). The neutrino and dark energy
    10. Ahmed Zewail, Egyptian-American Chemist, presidential advisor (Chemistry Nobel 1995). Femto chemi-stry
    11. Steven Chu, US Secretary of Energy (Nobel 1997). Optical molasses

  • Nuclear Standard Model is based on visual effects that comes in 1/3, 2/3, 1 forms (2009) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Visual Illusions comes in 1/3, 2/3, 1 forms that made physicists theorize 1/3q, 2/3q, 1q electric charge units and  E, 2E, 3E Energies that expalin these claims of magical powers of High energy Physics particles that does not exist and scientists keep looking at the same thing and tells us it is new particles inside the nucleus but we can Not detect them like Neutrinos for example. This is a Mathematical proof that these particles des not exist but it does exist on campuses and on campuses only where physicists enjoys saying anything publishing anything based on nothing and nothing comes from visual illusions presented as proof for Scientifically ignorant USA Congress to fund when there is no discovery    


  • 350 Years in Hiding: Kepler's-Newton's Time Dependent Equations (2009) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    For 350 years physicists astrophysicists and mathematicians missed Kepler's time dependent equation that produced a time dependent Newton's solution and together these two equations combined classical and quantum mechanics into one Universal Mechanics that explain relativistic effects as the difference between time dependent measurements and time independent measurements of moving objects and give theory to experiments results with precisions better than all of published physics and solves all posted motion puzzles that the 100,000 space-to imaginarty time -back to space, make- believe jumping continuum (x, y, z, ict) physicists could not solve by  space-time physics or any said or published physics.


  • 2009 Total Collapse of General Relativity Theory: CM Draconis Binary Stars Motion (2009) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Two Dozen Mavericks of Astronomy studied the low mass binary system CM Draconis and the data came out in april 2009 and they took the data to test General relativity theory. The data was so far off they discarded discussing the possibility that relativity can expalin this motion and this motion is solved by Newton's time dependent equation with precision to make space-time ashamed of themselves 


  • 20th Century Physics' Greatest Mistake is E = mc? (2009) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    20th Century Physics Greatest Mistake is E = mc?

     


  • 2008 General Relativity Failures: The Case of V731 Cep Binary Stars Motion Puzzle Solution Without Rigging (2008) [Updated 4 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Beside Gravity probe of NASA and Stanford failure and European LHC failure New data and new ideas to rig General Relativity Theory keep coming up and what is needed is dumping relativity and the inferior thinking of space-timers. this is another proof that space -time Nobel prize winners confusions of physics of silly space -time has no proof and what they gave as proof is garbage that would be sent back to sender  


  • Relativity Failures 2006: The Case of NV CMa Binary Stars (2006) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    This ia another Binary star system in contradicitons with relativity theory proving that not only relativity theory is wrong but relativity theory is stupidity itself because time is not a structure to allow space - to time - back to space jumping regardless what fortune hunters Nobel prize winners have/had to say about.


  • General Relativity Theory: Confusion of Physics; The Case of GG Orion Binary Stars Motion (2000) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    General Relativity Theory is mot good emough the simplest problem in physics and that would be the two body problem or two ecplising detached binary stars because the theory failed to account correctly for the "apparent" axial rotations of the orbit of binary stars and it claims additional fictional forces  and four dimensional universes without proof when the whole thing is a case of centuries of astronomy and astronomers still can not read their telescopes    


  • 1997 General Relativity Failures: The Case of SW Canis Majoris Binary Stars Systems (1997) [Updated 4 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    The Maverick of Astrophysicits and Authoriy on Bianry stars Dr Lacy of University of Arkansas strikes again predicting near 12,000 years axial rotation period of Binar stars SW Canis majoris and the Physics to replace relativity gave 12017 years. This kind of precision of non-relativistic replacements is unprecedented and could never be matched by space-time physics.   


  • Einstein's Relativity Failures #3: The Case of V1143Cgyni Binary Stars Axial Rotation Rate Puzzle Solution (1990) [Updated 4 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    This is the solution to the third binary stars system  with puzzling orbit axial rotation rate posted on Smithsonian NASA website SAO/NASA that Einstein and all 100,000 space-time "physicists" could not solve by space-time physics or said or any published physics. The first binary stars were DI Her binary stars with low rate and the second case were As camelopardis binary stars with very high rate and this case V1143Cgyni binary stars system has a medium rate.


  • Einstein's Relativity Failures #4: The Case of DI Hya Binary Stars System (1990) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Relativity failures # 4: Close by binary stars systems were chosen as test for General relativity theory for past century and with the data that came out a dozen candidates of Bianry stars systems with very accurate data were chosen to test relativity theory and relativity theory failed every one of them. Here is case # 4 DI Hya Bianry stars system that can only be solved by time dependent newton's equation I discovered in 1977 at age 19 while freshman physics Major.    


  • Einstein's Relativity Failures #5: The Case of Professor Lacy of University of Arkansas and V541Cgyni (1990) [Updated 4 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    From billions of stars there are few thousands of close by stars that astronomers looked at and documented their dimensions and motions and picked few dozens of the binary stars as a test of General relativity and General relativity failed every one of them. This one was picked many times and Dr Lacy of University of Arkansas decided that it is a good case against relativity theory and here is the solution to this motion puzzle solved by time dependent Newton's equation and another nail to end space-time confusions of physics.


  • Alpha Coronae Borealis: A Binary Stars System Motion in Contradiction with Relativity Theory (1986) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Alpha Coronae Borealis is a system of Binary stars whose solution says Einstein's silly relativity theory is "Paper" physics. Proof is attached


  • Einstein's Relativity Failures #2: DI Her Apsidal Motion Puzzle Solution (1985) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    This is the solution to the "Quarter of a century" Smithsonian-NASA Posted motion puzzle that all 100,000 space-time physicists Astronomers and Mathematicians colud not solve by space-time confusion of physics or by any said or published physics including 109 years of Nobel prize winner physics and and 400 years of astronomy. For 350 years Physicists Astrophysicists and Mathematicians and all others including Newton and Kepler themselves missed time dependent areal velocity law solution that produced a time dependent Kepler's equation solution and led to a  time-dependent Newton's equation solution and these two new time dependent equations combined classical mechanics and quantum emchanics into one universal mecahnics and explained relativity theory as the difference bewtween time dependent measurements and time independent measurements of moving objects along the line of sight and it explained apsidal motion as the difference between time dpendent measuremenst and time independent measuremenst of angular velocity with precision better than and without space-time ficiton or space-time on demand of fictional forces used by main stream Harvard MIT Cal-Tech NASA Perimeter Insitute and all other Dollar Store Physics departments.   


  • Einstein's Relativity Failures #1: The Case of As Camelopardis Apsidal Motion Puzzle Solution (1984) [Updated 4 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    This is the solution to the 30 years most studied Binary Stars with high rate orbit axial rotations puzzle that made astrophysicists wipe their glasses and wipe their high tech telescopes eyepieces and sent Einstein's space-time physics research papers solutions back to sender and said "NO" to the 100,000 space-time Physicists and Astrophysicists in their hideouts after they could not solve this motion puzzle by any said or published Physics for thirty years including 109 years of Nobel Prize winner Physics and physicists and 400 years of astronomy and is dedicated to the two DRS KH. F. Khailullin and V.S. Kozyreva of Moscow University who posted this motion puzzle in 1983 as not solvable by space-time physics or any said or published Physics and still posted as the motion puzzle to solve on Smithsonian-NASA website SAO/NASA.


  • First Experimental Proof of "Not" Constant Velocity of Light (1983) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Binary stars Emitts light toward Earth and light aberrations measurements were found to be spin orientation dependent and the correct answer is [2 x orbit velocity of center of mass] +/- spin velocity of primary star +/- spin velocity of secondary star indicating light aberrations measurements are spin velocity orientation dependent confirming velocity additions and subtrations to light speed and contradicting the principle of the constant velocity of light. 


  • Red-Shift Spin Dependence Experimental Proofs (1983) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    The red-shift readings of stars motion is found to be spin velocity and spin orientation dependent from experimental data of 5 of the most studied close by binary stars motion


  • DI Her 1980: The problem that started a wave to unseat Einstein (1980) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Abstract: This is the solution to the original binary stars system DI Her proposed by University of Moscow professors as a puzzle to be solved in 1980. This binary stars system is a century studied detached binary stars system that made Einstein's and others relativity theories useless and started a wave to unseat make beleive physics of relativity. 


  • Real time gravity (1980) [Updated 4 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Defining gravity as mass different from zero and distance between object and observer greater than zero will produce observed force as a sign of the exitence of gravity 


  • Reines and Cowan wrong: Savannah River Netrino Experiment (1980) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Coincidental registration of gammas of energy one caught from pair annihilations and one caught within 5 micro seconds later from neutron capture used as a proof of the existence of the neutrino and the validity of the neutrino theory leading to the validity of relativity theory is not justified. The time gate of 25 micro second of gammas rays moving in a solution of water-tri ethyl benzene with refractice indeces of 1.33-1.44 yields a motion time delay of 4.46475-5 microseconds exactly indicating the oppoiste of Reines and Cowans claims of two different nuclear reactions.   


  • Mu - Muon elementary particle is a bundle of 207 diffracted electrons (1980) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Elementary particles is a scam and this article is a proof of physicists scams. To make an elementary particle three things needed and theare (1) That this particle exists and (2) that it has a life time and (3) that it has mass. Using junk experimentation of a bucket a conuter and Billy bob math it can be done and Nobel prizes attached and no physics!   


  • Dark Energy Tribe of fraud (1980) [Updated 4 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Dark energy fraud started long time ago and it has an SI prefix index of Micro [Reines] then Nano then Pico and now stands at femto with femto chemistry and femto physics. Why it is fraud? Take an electron and let it flash inside a medium like bubble chamber and take a picture of it and few micro seconds latter take another picture and you will see a different size flash wave! Because electrons get delayed in mediums and they do not travel without diffraction and You say it is a different particle; then, get a Camera to take pictures with Nano speed and compare it with the micro speed picture and the damn thing is a new picture (execuse me particel). Then keep going to pico scale and then try something new so that Alfred Nobel institution does not get embarrassed to get a Nobel Prize for the same crooks ideas more than dozen times why not Alfred Nobel Institution not give the damn Nobel prize to Eygptian Ahmed Zewail in 1999. He is a Cal -Tech Club now! By now the word is so much in use everyone believe in crooks and their dark ways: See how Physicists decieved all and created few dozen High energy elementary particles  from visual effects using high speed scanners and different index of refractions mediums DarkEnergyCrooks@Dumb.USA.Congress.Gov        


  • Newton's Rotational equation expalins space - time dents (1980) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Historically Space - Time dents is the gravitational field described by relativity theory of Albert Einstein or the gravitational constant G = 6.674 x 10-11 and the 1/5 ratio Amplitude described by Dr Richard Feynman. In simple words relativity and quantum mechanics of nature that Einstein - Feynman duo claim had outsmarted Newton and provided better. Sir Isaac Newton's reply to that: In your dreams!


  • Atomic Energy and Academic Fraud: The Case of the Hydrogen Atom (1979) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    If you study 25 years and get a phd in atomic physics then you can use quantum relativistic mechanics used by nobel prize winners physicists to describe the bound state of the hydrogen atom which happened to be -13.6 electron volt, the alternative is dumping relativistic mechanics and use high school Newton's - Kepler's equations and get better results; better results because you can get the -13.6 electron volts and not do ellaborate rigging of nature and do not have dump your intelligence and accept make-believe space-to timeback to space jumping travel or quantum fraud. Here is how the ionization energy of -13.6 is calculated from Newton's-Kepler's equations          


  • Atomic Energy Academic Incompetence: The case of the line spectra of the atom (1979) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    The line spectra of the atom is a continuous line spectrum and dependent on the difference bewtween two sine squared quantities derived from Newton's - Kepler's time dependent equation that combined classical mechanics and quantum mechanics and deleted relativity and gave a line spectra mathematical description better than all said or published physics and matched experimental results with precision better than the approximated line spectra formula circulated     


  • Shrodinger Equation derived From Newton's - Kepler's F = 0 (1979) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Shrodinger Equation is and can be derived from Newton's - Kepler's F = 0

    The wrong assumption that Kepler's Newton's equations can not explain wave phenomenon is a german completing the work of a frenchman bad mouthing of an englishman howver this bad mouthing was adopted in school and it is time for soap to wipe shrodinger   


  • Nuclear Energy Discovery II: NO Expanding Universe (1979) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    The Negative Energy Spectrum readings shows that the stars are moving away from each other but those reading does not mean physical movement away from each other and the idea of an expanding universe is silly to say the least    


  • Nuclear Energy Discovery III: No Big Bang Ever Happened (1979) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    The Negative Energy Spectrum readings suggest that when astronomers look and read the energy spectrum of the stars studying their movement the stars look as if running away from each other suggesting expanding universe leading to the idea of the big bang when the only bang that had happened is in Astrophysicists silly readings because these readings amounts to miss readings of movements or the confusion between actual motion and apparent motion  


  • Nuclear Energy Discovery Supreme: 2/3[100% + 100%/3]= 88.88 % silly missing dark energy (1979) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Missing Dark Energy is estimated missing at a rate of 2/3 of the total mass of the universe and 2/3 of the 1/3 found mass meaning the rate of missing matter that exist in the universe is 2/3[100 % + 100%/3] = 88.88 % of the mass of the universe is missing or is dark energy prompting USA department of energy to sign a contract with NASA to find ways to find that 88.88 % missing energy and my god! How much USA goverment can get dumb and how much corrupt American scientists could get because the whole thing is based on readings that represent "apparent" readings and not actual readings    


  • Nuclear Energy Discovery I: The Negative Energy Spectrum (1979) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    The Ngeative energy spectrum that lead to the ideas of Expanding Universe, Big Bang and Dark Energy is derived and mathematically shown that there is no proof of any of that    


  • Energy and Mass Balance Without Fictious Dark Energy (1979) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Mass and Energky Balance is simply achived with: m (radioactive neutrons)Exp [ - L t] = mass (proton) + mass (electron). It is just Nobel prize winners who can not do simple math and because the mass equation is wrong. And the correct mass equation is not what Nobel prize winners suggested mass (neutron) = mass (proton) + m (electron) + m (anti neutrino) where neutrino and other make up particles make up 88.88 of the universe mass and energy and we human idiots can not detect them and because they are dark!. It is not just incopetence but also organized fraud to think dark energy. Well, someone tell nobel prize winners to keep neutrinos to themsleves    


  • Universal gravitational constant G: Investigative report (1979) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    The Universal gravitational constant G has a unit dimesion of [G] = [1/(density)(time)(time)] = [1/(p)(T)(T)]. It is shown that G is not constant but has a mathematical formula that is atmospheric denisty and rotational period dependent.


  • Chadwick's Neutron mistake (1979) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Chadwick's Nuclear decay addition mistake led to the Neutron mistake


  • Harvard Physics Department Monopoly Games: The Insignificance of Relativity Experimental Proofs (1978) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Harvard provided two of the four experiemntal proofs of General Relativity Theory with two insignificant physicist experiments boosting its reputation as a physics HUB. These four experimental proofs of general relativity theory has a sceintific value of about 1/2 an onion. In this paper we will take the first Harvard proof of space-time continuum and that is the Puond Rebka experiment and see how harvard manupulated others for jobs money and prestige. Look at the numerical answer and see how much significance this experiment has?! Let me tell you what I read: If you bounce a photon 11 meters down and 11 meters up its frequency changes by a factor of order of [5.1 +/- 0.5] x10^-15 meaning that if you send a photon 11 meters up and 11 meters down whose frequency is of the order of a million billion 1,000,000,000,000,000 times per second then its frequency will change by 5 times a second as if Harvard has means to count the difference if a photon with 1000,000,000,000,000 frequency and a photon with 999,999,999,999,995 frequency. I am not only saying Harvard physics department is at least 51% fraud but adding that MIT Cal-Tech NASA and all top Top ten money hungry Physics department are like that.


  • Earth-Planets Telecommunications and "Apparent" Shapiro's Time Delays Solutions / Constant (1978) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Earth-planets Telecommunications time delays around the moving sun derived from three dimensional time-dependent Newton - Kepler's equations solution gives round trip time delay around the sun rate when applied to actual data it gives extremely accurate results more accurate than Shapiro's Space-time-delay and without Einstein's or any other make-believe space-time fictional forces or space-time fiction.


  • De Sitter Wrong: The Binary Stars Thought Experiment (1978) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    De Sitter proposition/thought-experiment:

    • Is: L = n L (0) ≈ n {c?T/2 [v (p) + v (s)]} derived and explained in full text

    Modern Astronomy Binary Stars data fit this equation in large numbers indicating that if De Sitter binary stars thought experiment is a valid thought experiment with valid math and physics then a very large number of binary stars systems are just single stars with double images contradicting his conclusions of the constant velcoity of light.


  • Axial Rotations Rate Calculations in Eclipsing Detached Binary Stars / Planetary Systems (1978) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Axial orbital rotations in binary stars /planetary systems systems calculations using published data is found to be orbit and spin velocities dependent that can be formulated in a formula and a table as shown with results better than all space-time physics or any published physics.   


  • Nuclear Standard Model is Illusion based: Nature's 1/3, 2/3, 1 visual deceptions (1978) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    This is a re-run of my 1978 article about the non existence of elementary particles like neutrinos or particles with very short life times or Zero mass because all are the results of visual effects that appears in nuclear reactors or nuclear accelerators and chambers where gases are used to track its path and these come in 1/3, 2/3, 1 ratios visual effects that exaplins these "claims" of elementary particles with magic powers to cross burning stars at light speed without hindering and presented as the most abundant particles in space but we are unable to catch anyone of them. This trend of saying anything publishing anything based on nothing is Academic fraud based on visual effects and visual effects only like Neutrinos.        


  • The Four Experimental Proofs of General Theory of Relativity: What Proofs? (1978) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    All experimental proofs of general relativity theory does not proof anything: proof is included


  • Plank's Constant h; E = 1/2 mc? The Case of the Single Slit Experiment (1978) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Plank's Constant h; E = 1/2 mc?: The Case of the Single Slit Experiment that proof that h = mass x areal velocity = mr??/2 and it is not a Universal constant and E = mc?/2 and not E = mc?


  • Wave-Particle Duality: Particles seen in real time will have a wave-like profile (1978) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    The much talked about wave particle duality is a case of particles and physics labs generated wave like make-ups. What I am saying is that the particles are making wave patterns because the wave patterns are instrument generated and not natural motions like the size of the slit for example. If light is a wave then the atmosphere will be an entirely interference pattern and since the atmospher is not an interference pattern indicating the wrong assumption of wave motion and wrong thinking of an existence of a wave particle duality.


  • Early Quantum Mechanics:a silly name for Newton's F = 0 (1978) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Abstract: Physicists always say the erroneous notion that Newton's-Kepler's mechanics is a "limit" case of quantum wave - mechanics. I am going to prove the opposite of their claim that "quantum" mechanics is not a new mechanics but a confusion of a new mechanics or a silly conclusion of a freshman physics exercise when the force F = 0 in Newton's - Kepler's mechanics that have/had been solved wrong for 350 years. E = h w can be derived from F = 0 and the silly "quantum" is about to be shown silly to say the least      


  • Einstein's Relativity Space-Time physics is the result of Earth-Planet light signal miss reading by Astronomers (1978) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Abstarct: Earth 19 th century Astronomers along with 20th century Astronomers and to date astronomers can not read their telescopes. Relativistic time delays coming from planet Mercury with 48.28 km/sec to moving Earth of 29.81 km/sec adding to 78.09km/sec or 78.09 km divided by light velocity of 300,000 km/sec adds up to 260.3 micro second delays as predicted  by time delays formulas [see my article Earth-Interplanetary telecommunications time delays]. This velocity v = 48.28 km/sec mistake divided by light velcity c  gives the angle of light aberration: arc tan (v/c) when applied to Perihelion advance [see my article: planetary motion around the sun] gives the 43'' of an arc per century visual effects meaning that space-time is just visual effects or the first proof of general relativity theory is just a Nobel prize winners that can not read a telescope   


  • Compton's "Apparent" Wave-Length Contraction Effect (1978) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Compton's wave length contraction is an "apparent" visual effect length contraction with no actual or Physical contraction or "apparent" things that you see and looks real    


  • 11th century refraction law Sine i = n sine r derived fron Newton's-Kepler's F = 0 (1978) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Newton's Kepler's equation Force F = 0 gives the 11 century rectlinear description of refraction law sine i = n sine r making the electromagnetic description  a copy of old work


  • Coulomb's - Maxwell's Electromganetic Theory: a re-run of of F = m a (1978) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Coulomb's force F = - GmM/(r.r) = - k q Q/(r.r) and the solution gives maxwell equation not as new physics but gives maxwell equation as result of a time dependent solution of Newton's-Kepler's equations. Meaning that the incomplete solution gives of newton's - Kepler's equations led to the confusion of new theory called electromagnetic theory. Furthermore, all of Modern physics is a bad copy of Newton's - Kepler's solution that had been solved wrong fro 350 years and the complete solution combines all of Physics in one Equation: S = m r; State S = mass m x distance r    


  • Quantum = classical + relativistic (1978) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    500 years of physics and 500,000 physicists and one mistake: We do not see objects but we see Images. With I = image and O = object...

    • I = I
    • I = O + (I - O)
    • I/O = O/O + (I - O)/O
    • (I/O) = 1 + [(I - O)/O]
    • (I/O) q = q + [(I - O)/O] q
    • Quantum = classical + relativistic
    • Visual = classical + visual effects

    As an application, see how 500 years of physics and 500,000 physicists made the same mistake using Mercury's motion around the sun, including...

    1. Copernicus
    2. Galileo
    3. Brahe
    4. Kepler
    5. Hooke
    6. Newton
    7. Laplace
    8. Le Verrier
    9. Einstein
    10. All others

  • Relativitistic Gravitational Red Shifts Confusions: Harvard's Pound Rebka Confusion of an Experiment (1977) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Projected Light/Electromagnetic spectrum aberration effects along the line of sight round trip total of 22.6 meters inside Harvard Davis Lab roof to basement in 1959 and it measuremnt of  5.0+/-0.5 x10^-15 saying that the Harvard prefessors can tell the differenece of a signal that ocillates a million billion times a second [10^15 = 1,000,000x1,000,000,000] and a signal that ocillates a million billion times a second plus 5 more turns? They have no proof of that! They said it and claim Geneous work to prove but I am not a member of the scientifically ignorat United States Cogress to beleieve such crap     


  • Where Relativity Collapsed: Apsidal Motion of Binary Stars Solution (1977) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    From all the thousands of close by detached binary stars systems astronomers picked up a dozen sets of binary stars systems as candidates to test general theory of relativity and piled extensive accurate data to do the tests and general relativity failed every one of them and the solution came from a 350 years missed kepler's=Newtton's time dependent equation 


  • Mercury "Apparent" Advance of Perihelion of 43 " of an Arc / Century (1977) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Light aberrations equations along the line of sight derived from time dependent Kepler's areal velocity equation gives rates results for the advance of perihelion of planets around their mother sun that are better than all published space-time physics and for Planet Mercury it is equal to 43".0 of an arc per century.


  • Alfred Noble Flea Market of Physics and Academia (1977) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    The high price tag of experimentaion in Modern physics have/had produced a cost cutter physics that produced a flea market physics and academia of time travellers big bangers super stringers fictional forces virtual interactions and all other flea market ideas     


  • E = mc?/2 and not E = mc? (1977) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    E = mc? is the optical illusion of E = mc?/2


  • Planetary Motion Around The Sun: Deleting Relativity Without Loss of Subject (1977) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Relative Planetary Motion around the mother Sun desciptions had many scientists say their math and the final three contestants were Newton Einstein and Nahhas and Nahhas won by double Knockout shwoing that Newton's solution was incomplete and measurement errors led to the 20th century error of relativity theory.  


  • Length Contraction: First Law of Relativity Theory: What Shrunk is Physics and Not Objects (1977) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Legnth contraction is just Nobel prize winner physiicts that can not read light or signal time delays or  light aberrations visual effects derived from classical mechanics and not real. Using this law to derive other laws of physics contracted  physics to a palm reading manual and did not contract objects because main stream physics can be read from Harvard physics department professor's notes or Dionne's Warwick's Psychic friends network manual  


  • Where are the Stars 1977? Venus as a Proof of Stars Misplacement (1977) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Stars and planets locations reading are incorrect. Planets and stars documented and published data shwoing aixal rotations rates have/had matched projected light aberrations visual effects measurements meaning if light aberrations are taken into considerations while collecting these data then this axial rotation is "apparent" and not real. The dependence of locations of planets and stars on light measurements with no light aberration correction associated with each measurement indicates planets and stars are as being "not exactly" where they are said or published to be


  • GPS: Global Positioning Systems (1977) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    President Obama's GPS, global positioning systems, relativistic time delays example of innovation is a case of bankrupt physics and bankurpt physicists community because global positioning relativistic time delays has nothing to do with Einstein's and the 100,000 main stream space-timers physicists relativistic confusions of physics because the signaling bewtween the satellite and Earth drivers is done with a satellite in motion with orbital speed and spinning Earth with spin speed and adding the two speeds time delays accounts for the 45 micro seconds per day time delays without Einstein and the 100,000 space-timers club of Crystal balls readings of physics     


  • Special Relativity Theory:Based on two erroneous principles (1977) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    If projected light aberrations visual effects are taken as length contraction and trick oursleves to beleive that two objects moving at c velocities in opposite directions and their relative speed is also c then the make-beleive relativity theory is possible in its entirety.   


  • Nuclear Gravity: Planetary motion can be expalined by Nuclear force (1977) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Newton's gravitational force and Einstein's additional force put together can be replaced by a Yukawa like outwrad nuclear force that can explain planetary motion around the sun as a rotating elliptical orbit that matches experimnetal data and without the non proven space-time continuum of main stream physics. In 2008 space-time continuum blew up the 500 million gravity probe of NASA-Stanford project and made stanford change their website from "Greatest" physicist to "evicting" Einstein 


  • The New Red - Shift: A Newly Born Universe (1977) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    The red-shift z = d L/L = v/c = Doppler Shift is incorrect and the correct fromula is z = v2/2c2 leading to a totally new Universe not expanding but seen correctly.


  • Time: is a scale and not a dimension except on Campus (1977) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Time: A scale and not a dimension

    Abstract: Time as a dimension used in scientific calculation not only can lead to fires and failures but to making fools out of the scientific community. Proof is attached.

    Present time = present time

    Present time = past time + [present time - past time]

    Equipment time = event time + time delays

    Physics Experiment = physics theory + time delays

    Physics live = Event + corrections

     
    A measurement is an event taken in present time of another event that happened in the past. We measure what is happening live in present time of what had happened in an event that already had happened.


  • Inverse Cube Force motion delays (1977) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    An Inverse cube force give motion delays as inverse square force motion delays  


  • Light motion (1977) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    All there is in the universe is particles in motion and light is a particle in motion. A particle in motion measured in real time along the line of sight is a wave! What is funny is the difference between a particle and a wave is a pure optical Illusion modern physicists call space - time


  • Relativity theory is dead (1977) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    A detailed proof that Relativistic experimental proofs means signal measurements time delays visual effects; meaning that the claims of modern physcis and physicists of past 150 yeras are not only wrong but silly to say the least and at the top of them is Einstein.


  • First Nobel Prize winners 1902 crime against physics (1977) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Length contraction is a visual effect that won Lorentz in 1902 a Nobel Prize for changing physics from real time to wrong time and lead to relativity theory of Time travel that no one has a clue what is it and dark energy or the idea of hooking a hose to the sky and funnel dark energy and  the energy is to be found from this dark idea and lead to black holes that no one saw and big bang no one heard and elementary particles that can be found on college campus and textbooks only and all other Nobel prize winner physics and all without one proof.


  • The mathematical proof of Einstein is wrong (1977) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    It is not the fact Einstein and Alfred Nobel Physicists and all of modern physics and physicists are wrong but it is the fact I can prove them wrong at least 1001 times with unprecedented accuracy


  • The Mathematical proof of Einstein and all modern physics and physicists are all wrong (1977) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Gone with one (Ein) stone (stein)
     I am not saying Alfred Nobel physics and physicists are all wrong but what  I am saying is that I can prove Einstein and Alfred Nobel physicists are all wrong with unprecedented accuracy and match experiments with unprecedented accuracy.


  • Johann Georg Van Soldner 1801 light bending historical mistake (1977) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    In 1801 Johann Georg Van Soldner attempted to calculate light bending and he came up with the wrong formula. Einstein and others rigged all of the universe to explain the optical illusion of double the amount that Johann Georg Van Soldner came up with. Correcting Johann Georg Van Soldner mathematical mistake doubles Johann Georg Van Soldner amount and wipes up the Illusion that Alfred Nobel physicists came up with.


  • It is a particle you dummy: A particle motion visual effects is a wave motion with Newton's - Kepler's F = 0 (1976) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Newton's Kepler's F = 0 solution is a wave equation describing the motion of a particle, meaning that wave-particle duality talk is silly because it is all particles and a particle's  wave- like visual effects is just nature's beauty that Alfred Nobel Prize winners did not see   


  • Royal England wrong physics and wrong Physicists Newton Eddington Einstein (1976) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Newton changed Kepler's law and this change produced errors two centuries later these errors given names such as relativity theory and quantum mechanics and after 300 years of royal imposed errors the difference between science and fiction is a flip of a coin. Proof is attached.  


  • Sir Issac Newton Most famous Equation: wrong (1976) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Sir isaac Newton most famous equation is the inverse square law and can be proven wrong. Proof is attached  


  • Kepler's Third Law = Newton's Inverse Square Law (1976) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Acceleration is defined in as distance divided by time squared or Newton's acceleration a = r/(t. t) = k/(r.r) which means (r. r. r)/(t. t) = k which is Kepler's law.


  • Earth Absolute Motion: Waiting on Discovery (1974) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Finding new sources of energy require the elimination of bad physics and bad physics starts with Einstein's space-time (x, y, z, ict) confusion of physics that lead to energy fraud symbol E = mc? because energy spent is based on distance traveled and not relative distance and distance traveled is self referenced distance or absolute motion when added to relative motion it will lead to finding what is missing in all of physics and that would be the relation bewtween mass m spin s and orbit r or the blue prints of the universe structural design and its composition of mass motion and spin. Fonding absolute motion os Earth can lead to solar "systems" mechanics applied to the Nuclear shell structure have a potential to cough New sources of Energy.     


  • Light projection velocity and not light velocity that is measured as constant (1974) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Light velcoity as stated by Relativity theory is wrong and here is the experimental proof that light velocity c is not constant


  • MMX: It Took Glamorous Aether and Gave Dumb Space-time (1973) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Detailed analysis of MMX showing the incompetence of Michelson and Morley theory behined the MM confusion of an experiment that replaced 19 century Glamorous notion of Aether with 20 century confusion of physics. 


  • Perihelion precession period 400 years old formula found in hiding ending relativity (1973) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    This formula is never seen by anyone before except me and when I discovered it I was 15 years old and it is my first experimentally verified formula for the Perihelion precession period and it has nothing to do with silly relativity theory or any said or published physics.       


  • Einstein's Relativistic Bully of Time Equation (1973) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Time Bullying has an equation and its fits Nobel prize winners data. This equation explains all quantum relativistic effects experimental proofs as visual effects with supper accuracy.


  • Le Verrier Historical Mistake that Created Relativity Stupidity (1973) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    The Mistake that created Relativity stupidity is uncovered 


  • Copernicus Wrong Time (1973) [Updated 6 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    When Copernicus took the Heliocentric description of the solar system from Al-Khazen he left Ibn Sahl real time description of light emitted from the planets orbiting the sun. For 500 years physics changed from real time to wrong time. When the planetary system is attached a 1000 years old real time description everything that is written from Copernicus days can be deleted without loss of subject  


  • Earth's Axial tilt 23.4392 degress illusion (1973) [Updated 4 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Earth axial tilt of 23.4393 degrees is a visual illusion that came from three measurement errors. (1) circle cicumference in a rotating Earth. (2) Moment of inertia of a sphere (2/5) and index air of refraction n = 1.000293. The error is found in all astronomical data of past 500 years and found in all physics constants = (1/1.000293) sine Inverse [1/(2/5)(2 x 3.1415)] = 23.4393 degrees 


  • 50 out 1001 Mersury's perihelion precession advance (1973) [Updated 4 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Mercury's perihelion is an experimental error made on Earth and the proof is attached and I dare the human race to prove it wrong. I included 50 out of 1001 ways to caalculate Mercury's perihelion precession advance in 1970's


  • NASA knows nothing about space I (1971) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    NASA and 500 years of modern and Nobel physicst and astronomers use the celstial sphere and the celestial sphere gives Troposheric reading and everything measured is tilted 23.44 degress and 90 - 23.44 degress gives Einstein's relativity theory numbers and 500 years of wrong modern and Nobel astronomy, Earth's troposheric layer is a water vapor layer or ocengraphic layer that created fiction space and fictional nuclear science and I dare not only NASA but the entire human race 


  • 500 years of wrong astronomy (1971) [Updated 4 years ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    Another method of wrong NASA and 500 years of modern and Nobel physicists and astronomers


  • NASA knows nothing about space II (1971) [Updated 5 months ago]
    by Joe Alexander Nahhas   read the paper:

    NASA and 500 years of modern and Nobel physicst and astronomers use the celstial sphere and the celestial sphere gives Troposheric reading and everything measured is tilted 23.44 degress and 90 - 23.44 degress gives Einstein's relativity theory numbers and 500 years of wrong modern and Nobel astronomy. This is another method to prove NASA celestial sphere is a crystal ball