Enter the content which will be displayed in sticky bar


Speaker:
Franklin Hu
CNPS Saturday Morning Science Discussion

Date: 2016-11-19 Time: 00:00 - 12:00 US/Eastern (4 months 4 days ago)
America/Los Angeles: 2016-11-18 21:00 (DST)
America/New York: 2016-11-19 00:00 (DST)
America/Sao Paulo: 2016-11-19 01:00
Europe/London: 2016-11-19 04:00
Asia/Colombo: 2016-11-19 09:30
Australia/Sydney: 2016-11-19 15:00 (DST)

Where: Online Video Conference
Recording Playback
This video conference used Fuzemeeting.
The meeting can be replayed by clicking this link:
https://youtu.be/mQRdyWmTq7I


Description

The CNPS is restarting its Saturday morning science video chats for CNPS members and general public. The first ones will be more open to topics and discussion than for presentations. If you have a topic you wish to discussion, send us and email at franklinhu@yahoo.com

The link for the conference is: http://fuze.me/naturalphilosophy

Fuze Meeting Number:  338-73-502


Is the number system messed up? Should we consider negative numbers or the operations on them?
Negative multiplied by negative to make a positive makes no sense
Empirical evidence can always be scaled to be a positive number
Dark Matter or Missing matter? What are the explanations for galaxy rotational curves?
Mass defect at the galaxy scale making matter less massive at the edge of a galaxy.
Modified gravity theories
Gravity theories based on electrodynamics
Gravity wears out or runs down towards the center of the galaxy
Dark matter is already presuming a solution to the missing matter problem
What is the difference between positive and negative charge?
Just a convention?
What exactly is the physical difference
What is the structure of an electron - a torus
New web site to explain electron structure:  http://www.symmetrymath.org/
Are electrons spherically symmetric?
Do penning traps show asymmetric behavior?
Is it about theories or empirical evidence
If evidence doesn\'t agree with theory, it is ignored
Books present theory not evidence
Role of logic is ignored in mainstream.
New theories aggressively discouraged if conflict with mainstream.